Mega menu is possible in BS5 but we will need to create a custom template layout for the navigation widget. The following is a hard-coded example.
FA6+ icons will work on all widgets.
The FMH Icon box will need a new version created because the styling is broken in Bootstrap 5 templates (this has nothing to do with FA).
Icons can now be used in Content blocks by pasting the HTML tags from www.fontawesome.com into the HTML editor.
Here are some new icons from Font Awesome 6
Code snippits from http://getbootstrap.com pasted into Content Blocks.
.accordion-body
, though the transition does limit overflow.
.accordion-body
, though the transition does limit overflow.
.accordion-body
, though the transition does limit overflow.
Tables
# | First | Last | Handle |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Mark | Otto | @mdo |
2 | Jacob | Thornton | @fat |
3 | Larry the Bird |
Default, out of the box, Bootstrap 5 templates available for widgets.
The navigation template used above is called Horizontal.
Third party documentation (i.e. summary/settlement sheets from the elevator) is required when applicable and available. Insureds are expected to have available hard copy records that will 1) support the total production raised for the crop/county/year being reviewed and 2) that can demonstrate how production was kept separate between various units, practices and types (if applicable).
Insureds will also want make themselves available to meet with the quality control reviewer as the reviews will need to be completed before the claims can be processed.
Title | Type | Size | |
93 KB | DownloadReplant Claim Checklist | ||
244 KB | DownloadPrevent Plant Claims Checklist | ||
757 KB | DownloadMPCI Production Claims Checklist | ||
12251 KB | DownloadGroup-Wire-FINAL-PDF-compressed | ||
15528 KB | DownloadGroup 2 Wire - FINAL PDF |
News list template is the only template available by default.
“With the trend of larger and larger farms, the probability of triggering a $200,000 APH review becomes more of a possibility,” Lass said. “As a compliance field specialist, I find insureds are comfortable with the accuracy of their current claim. What concerns them most is the possibility of a three-year review of production records.”
Three-year reviews can be triggered for many reasons, including a high-dollar claim, conflict of interest, or other RMA-directed reasons. These reviews involve a compliance field specialist working directly with the policyholder to gather records and confirm that all information aligns with what was reported over the past three years.
Lass explained that the concerns he hears vary but are all tied to time commitments and record keeping. Insureds worry about remembering which loads came from which unit on the assembly sheet, if their load log is available, and if their feed records are in order. On many occasions, insureds ask him if they need to be present for the bin measurements, and how long that might take.
“With FMH Precision Solutions using planting maps, harvest maps, and a calibration report, all these questions and more are answered,” he said. “Each unit is recorded for acres and production with the calibration report to verify accuracy.
FMH can use a farmer’s precision data to simplify multiple crop insurance processes and increase the accuracy of policy records. Plus, the data is entirely electronic, which makes for easy record keeping and storage for the farmer. If an insured is already using precision data for acreage reporting, production reporting, or claims, FMH will likely be able to use that same data for an APH review – and compliance specialists can access it in FMH systems for even more efficiency.
“I recently completed a $200,000 APH review for a 10,000-acre corn farmer using his precision planting records in the system from the previous year. Because the precision records matched what was reported, the review process took one hour,” he said.
Lass explained that had he used traditional methods and paperwork, this review process would have taken days to complete.
"The benefits to the insured were: no bin measurements, no assembly sheets, no load logs, and no feeding records required. Because the records matched, there was nothing for the insured to review or sign. As a bonus, no contact was required with the insured or agent!"
- David Lass, Compliance Field Specialist