Mega menu is possible in BS5 but we will need to create a custom template layout for the navigation widget. The following is a hard-coded example.
FA6+ icons will work on all widgets.
The FMH Icon box will need a new version created because the styling is broken in Bootstrap 5 templates (this has nothing to do with FA).
Icons can now be used in Content blocks by pasting the HTML tags from www.fontawesome.com into the HTML editor.
Here are some new icons from Font Awesome 6
Code snippits from http://getbootstrap.com pasted into Content Blocks.
.accordion-body
, though the transition does limit overflow.
.accordion-body
, though the transition does limit overflow.
.accordion-body
, though the transition does limit overflow.
Tables
# | First | Last | Handle |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Mark | Otto | @mdo |
2 | Jacob | Thornton | @fat |
3 | Larry the Bird |
Default, out of the box, Bootstrap 5 templates available for widgets.
The navigation template used above is called Horizontal.
Third party documentation (i.e. summary/settlement sheets from the elevator) is required when applicable and available. Insureds are expected to have available hard copy records that will 1) support the total production raised for the crop/county/year being reviewed and 2) that can demonstrate how production was kept separate between various units, practices and types (if applicable).
Insureds will also want make themselves available to meet with the quality control reviewer as the reviews will need to be completed before the claims can be processed.
Title | Type | Size | |
93 KB | DownloadReplant Claim Checklist | ||
244 KB | DownloadPrevent Plant Claims Checklist | ||
757 KB | DownloadMPCI Production Claims Checklist | ||
12251 KB | DownloadGroup-Wire-FINAL-PDF-compressed | ||
15528 KB | DownloadGroup 2 Wire - FINAL PDF |
News list template is the only template available by default.
Beginning with the 2018 crop year, RMA now requires reported production be within 5% accuracy or the farmer could face penalties, including using assigned yields for that APH year’s actual yield and loss of optional units.
According to the 2017 IPERA audit – a required annual audit for each AIP – the most prevalent reason for an improper payment for the 2016 fiscal year was due to production records not supported by evidence, incorrect or incomplete documents, and unverifiable evidence.
To reduce these types of occurrences, RMA continues to update review requirements to encourage the use of more accurate data for reporting, which can be achieved through precision ag technology. As more farmers adopt the technology, RMA’s requirements are becoming more precision-friendly
FMH Precision Solutions requires calibration to be within 3% accuracy during harvest. If a farmer is providing acceptable data for Precision Solutions, they will be within the 5% tolerance requirement by RMA.
When combines are calibrated accurately, they are more reliable when compared to measuring several bins, bags, or other farm-stored structures. Farmers should follow manufacturer guidelines when calibrating their equipment.
In addition, farmers can use FMH calibration reports that can be filled out by hand or entered electronically into a fillable PDF. Documenting various moisture and weight calibrations throughout harvest will enable the farmer to support claims and APH reviews via precision records.
Save Time
Generating records is fast and easy.
Less Paperwork
One set of documents saves on storage space.
No Need for Bin Measurements
Adjuster only needs precision tech production records, saving crucial time during harvest.
Most Accurate
Reduce worry about over- or under-reporting.
"Reviews tend to happen when a farmer is busy. Using precision for reviews simplifies the process a bunch - especially for farmers with a lot of livestock. [Last] year, I processed an APH review using precision data, and I didn’t need to spend nearly as much time with the insured because all the records were in one place!"
- John Paul Unruh, Compliance Field Specialist I