Mega menu is possible in BS5 but we will need to create a custom template layout for the navigation widget. The following is a hard-coded example.
FA6+ icons will work on all widgets.
The FMH Icon box will need a new version created because the styling is broken in Bootstrap 5 templates (this has nothing to do with FA).
Icons can now be used in Content blocks by pasting the HTML tags from www.fontawesome.com into the HTML editor.
Here are some new icons from Font Awesome 6
Code snippits from http://getbootstrap.com pasted into Content Blocks.
.accordion-body
, though the transition does limit overflow.
.accordion-body
, though the transition does limit overflow.
.accordion-body
, though the transition does limit overflow.
Tables
# | First | Last | Handle |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Mark | Otto | @mdo |
2 | Jacob | Thornton | @fat |
3 | Larry the Bird |
Default, out of the box, Bootstrap 5 templates available for widgets.
The navigation template used above is called Horizontal.
Third party documentation (i.e. summary/settlement sheets from the elevator) is required when applicable and available. Insureds are expected to have available hard copy records that will 1) support the total production raised for the crop/county/year being reviewed and 2) that can demonstrate how production was kept separate between various units, practices and types (if applicable).
Insureds will also want make themselves available to meet with the quality control reviewer as the reviews will need to be completed before the claims can be processed.
Title | Type | Size | |
93 KB | DownloadReplant Claim Checklist | ||
244 KB | DownloadPrevent Plant Claims Checklist | ||
757 KB | DownloadMPCI Production Claims Checklist | ||
12251 KB | DownloadGroup-Wire-FINAL-PDF-compressed | ||
15528 KB | DownloadGroup 2 Wire - FINAL PDF |
News list template is the only template available by default.
In the spring of 2017, FMH Adjuster Jed Beshore was contacted by a Seneca, New York insured to adjust for a replant claim. Luckily for the farmer, using precision data allowed Beshore to catch an error that would have cost him extra premium.
“Reviewing the acres for replant were easy: we had copies of the planting map and replant maps. The error was discovered when the planted acres from his precision data didn’t even come close to the acres reported to the FSA office,” said Beshore.
The farmer was able to pinpoint the problem because of the accuracy of his precision data.
“When we tried to verify the total acres to insure, we noticed we had a problem. We ask the insured to print all his plant maps, and he discovered that he had keyed some of the spraying acres as planted acres – therefore inflating the number of reported acres,” added Beshore.
The farmer, who had been through the Precision Claim process the previous year, was impressed by the results and grateful that the error was uncovered. He immediately sent the corrected data to his insurance agent, who provided it to FMH underwriters.
“If this was not a Precision Claim, the acres used would have been based off his FSA 578 report – which means he would have been paying extra premium for insurance,” said Beshore.
If a farmer is using precision ag technology while planting, the data collected can easily be used to verify a replant claim. The farmer just needs to provide planting maps and replant maps for the adjuster.