Mega menu is possible in BS5 but we will need to create a custom template layout for the navigation widget. The following is a hard-coded example.
FA6+ icons will work on all widgets.
The FMH Icon box will need a new version created because the styling is broken in Bootstrap 5 templates (this has nothing to do with FA).
Icons can now be used in Content blocks by pasting the HTML tags from www.fontawesome.com into the HTML editor.
Here are some new icons from Font Awesome 6
Code snippits from http://getbootstrap.com pasted into Content Blocks.
.accordion-body
, though the transition does limit overflow.
.accordion-body
, though the transition does limit overflow.
.accordion-body
, though the transition does limit overflow.
Tables
# | First | Last | Handle |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Mark | Otto | @mdo |
2 | Jacob | Thornton | @fat |
3 | Larry the Bird |
Default, out of the box, Bootstrap 5 templates available for widgets.
The navigation template used above is called Horizontal.
Third party documentation (i.e. summary/settlement sheets from the elevator) is required when applicable and available. Insureds are expected to have available hard copy records that will 1) support the total production raised for the crop/county/year being reviewed and 2) that can demonstrate how production was kept separate between various units, practices and types (if applicable).
Insureds will also want make themselves available to meet with the quality control reviewer as the reviews will need to be completed before the claims can be processed.
Title | Type | Size | |
93 KB | DownloadReplant Claim Checklist | ||
244 KB | DownloadPrevent Plant Claims Checklist | ||
757 KB | DownloadMPCI Production Claims Checklist | ||
12251 KB | DownloadGroup-Wire-FINAL-PDF-compressed | ||
15528 KB | DownloadGroup 2 Wire - FINAL PDF |
News list template is the only template available by default.
An APH review will be triggered if the farmer:
The farmer must provide production records supporting reported yields for the required years. If the farmer reported a claim for any of those years, the claim information can be used for the review.
If the farmer did not report a claim, they must provide total production with other records from that year. Traditionally, these records may include bin measurements, elevator receipts, weight tickets, feed records, and more. This can be extremely time consuming and may not always be accurate.
If a farmer is using Precision Crop Insurance Solutions for either reporting or claims, they are already gathering accurate information to provide total production numbers for that year.
Precision Solutions require a seeding map, calibration records, and a harvest wet-weight map (pictured). These documents can be used for an APH review, and can easily be pulled from their FMS or take up less storage space than traditional records. Farmers can also utilize the maps for associating production on a unit basis.
"Reviews tend to happen when a farmer is busy. Using precision for reviews simplifies the process a bunch - especially for farmers with a lot of livestock. This year, I processed an APH review using precision data, and I didn't need to spend nearly as much time with the insured because all the records were in one place!"
- John Paul Unruh, Compliance Field Specialist I
John Paul has been a crop adjuster in the Colorado, Kansas, and Nebraska area for over 10 years.